The following videos define some concepts of hedging and boosting and the importance of academic research writing.
Video #1: The importance of Hedging:
Example 1
Categorical claim
The issues highlighted in this study are applicable to all participating institutions.
Hedged claim
The issues highlighted in this study may be applicable to many participating institutions.
Example 2
Categorical claim
Government support will assure the spread of new knowledge and the skills necessary to use the internet to thousands of people in rural areas.
Hedged claim
Government support may help with the spread of new knowledge and the skills necessary to use the internet to thousands of people in rural areas.
Example 3
Categorical claim
The study proves the link between smoking and lung disease.
Hedged claim
The study indicates/suggests a (possible) link between smoking and lung disease.
Example 4
Categorical claim
The number of unemployed people will continue to raise as the poor economic situation persists.
Hedged claim
The number of unemployed people will probably continue to raise as the poor economic situation persists.
Example 5
Categorical claim
This (and subsequent) studies led to the conclusion that the GTP itself must be the elusive base, and therefore to the proposal of the GTP-as-base mechanism (Schweins et al 1994, 1995).
Hedged claim
This (and subsequent) studies led to the conclusion that the GTP itself may be the elusive base, and therefore to the proposal of the GTP-as-base mechanism (Schweins et al 1994, 1995).
Study notes:
Hedging represents the absence of certainty and it is used to describe any linguistic item or strategy employed to indicate either a lack of commitment to the true value of an accompanying preposition or desire not expressed.
Hedging allows writers/researchers to submit new arguments/claims into an ongoing dialogue while acknowledging that there might be other, equally valid, or perhaps better points of view.
Hedging allows writers/ researchers to have the flexibility to avoid making absolute/ categorical statements which claim that the writer/researcher has found the perfect and only answer
Hedging allows writers/researchers to offer something new and establish him/herself as a possible authority on a topic while leaving room for other voices and perspectives.
Without hedging the world is purely propositional
Video #2:Hedging and Boosting:
Example 1:
Clearly, these sale figures show a definite increase in consumer confidence, which will undoubtedly have an impact on our share price.
Example 2:
Employees will always respond positively to such circumstances.
Example 3:
Certainly, this has had an impact on learning outcomes.
Example 4:
This will have an impact on future research in the field.
Example 5:
These figures prove that there has been strong growth as a result of policy change.
We use Hedging when we want to soften what we assigned to avoid making too strong at the time
Boosting is the opposite of hedging (present a strong point of view)
General statements are not always true
A qualified claim is not an absolute claim.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario